N°021_Vol.1_28
- SƆGƆKIRÉ NATIVE SPEAKERS’ PERSONAL PRONOUN ERRORS IN ENGLISH:
- AN ERROR ANALYSIS
- Gérard MILLOGO
- Université Lédéa Bernard OUÉDRAOGO, Burkina Faso
- ORCID iD: 0009-0007-5478-0371
- gerard_millogo@ujkz.bf
- Lallé Michaël ZOUBA
- Centre Universitaire de Kaya, Université Joseph KI-ZERBO, Burkina Faso
- ORCID iD: 0009-0007-2700-2398
- michael.zouba@gmail.com
- Relwendé Bernadine ZOUNGRANA
- Université Joseph KI-ZERBO
- ORCID iD: 0009-0003-8679-1041
- zoungradina08@gmail.com
- &
- Abisoye ELESHIN
- Institute of African and Diaspora Studies
- University of Lagos, Nigeria
- ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3520-2775
- aeleshin@unilag.edu.ng
Introduction: Personal pronouns are essential components of grammar in every language. In English, personal pronouns encode person, number, gender in discourse, playing a central role in sentence cohesion, reference, and pragmatic meaning (Nelson, 2001). Therefore, the mastery of the English language by foreign language learners such as Sɔgɔkiré native speakers also depends on their ability to appropriately use personal pronouns. Difficulties in the use of these pronouns may result in poor communication in the language. Based on feedback from 12 years’ experience of teaching English as a foreign language, we observed that English as Foreign Language (EFL) learners in Burkina Faso Secondary schools encounter difficulties in the use of personal pronouns, which, most of the time, prevent them from improving their English written production. For the Sɔgɔkiré-speaking learners of English, who are also Burkinabe students, acquiring full competence in English personal pronoun usage presents persistent challenges. This is obvious as personal pronoun usage has always been problematic for EFL learners (Nokas, 2021). As writing is the most difficult task in English for EFL learners, the difficulties observed from Sɔgɔkiré speakers’ use of personal pronouns in written English can prevent them from acquiring full competence in written English (Harahap, 2023). In the literature, there is an exhaustive classification of personal pronouns. Some works, such as Stoian (2023), restrict them to a limited set, while others such as (Harahap, 2023; Handayani & Cenderato, 2023) adopt a broader range. Within this exhaustive classification, one aspect on which these researchers agree is that personal pronouns include both subject and object forms. The present study deals with the analysis of errors in personal pronouns, focusing specially on these two personal pronouns categories: subject personal pronouns, and object personal pronouns. The main objective of the study is to analyze errors in personal pronouns by Sɔgɔkiré native speakers in English in view of improving their written production. Specific objectives are to: point out the types of Sɔgɔkiré native speakers’ personal pronoun errors in English; find out the most frequent types of their personal pronoun errors; explain these errors. To reach the above objectives, we ask: what are the types of Sɔgɔkiré native speakers’ personal pronoun errors? Which of these error types has the highest frequency of occurrence in their English production? Why do they make these errors? The research hypotheses include: H1: Sɔgɔkiré native speakers’ personal pronoun errors are subject-pronoun and object-pronoun error types in English. H2: Among their personal pronoun errors, object-pronoun errors are the most frequent error types. H3: Sɔgɔkiré native speakers’ personal pronoun errors are due to both interlingual and intralingual sources in English.
Abstract: This study deals with personal pronoun errors made by Sɔgɔkiré native speakers in English. Personal pronouns are considered problematic for Burkinabe students in general and Sɔgɔkiré native speakers in particular. It aimed to identify types of errors, to determine the most frequent error type, and explain the causes of these errors. Data were collected from 40 participants, using two tests. A qualitative methodology was employed to analyze their personal pronoun errors in English. We deployed the error analysis theory framework by Gas and Selinker (1994) to guide the analysis. The findings of the study reveal that Sɔgɔkiré native speakers made subject and object pronoun errors in English, among which object pronoun errors were the most frequent error type. Additionally, the findings reveal that the errors of the participants were due to inter- and intra-lingual factors. Intralingual errors resulted from overgeneralization, ignorance of rule restriction, simplification, and developmental factors. Interlingual errors resulted from the interference of Sɔgɔkiré and French. Based on the findings, some pedagogical suggestions were made.
Keywords: Personal Pronouns, Error analysis, Interlingual errors, Intralingual errors, Sɔgɔkiré.
References
- Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research(4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
- Gass, S. M. & Selinker, L. (1994). Language transfer in language learning (2nd ed.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
- Hakidi, S. S. & Rahma, D. (2021). An analysis of students’ errors in using personal pronoun on writing descriptive text. Lesson Journal: Language, Applied Linguistics, and Education Journal, 3(2), 21-26.
- Handayani, E. R. P. & Cenderato, C. (2023). An analysis of non-English students understanding in using pronouns: correct and error pronouns. Journal of English Educational Study (JEES), 6(1), 41-50.
- Harahap, A. I. (2023). An analysis of students’ errors in using personal pronouns in writing descriptive text in the tenth grade of Sma Negeri 1 Tanjung Pura. Journal of Classroom Action Research, 2(1), 1-6.
- Hubbard, P. & al. (1983). A training course for TEFL. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
